2026 Mini­mum Stan­dard for Deter­mi­ning the Recy­cla­bi­li­ty of Pack­a­ging: What Is Chan­ging

2026 Mini­mum Stan­dard for Deter­mi­ning the Recy­cla­bi­li­ty of Pack­a­ging: What Is Chan­ging

Share:
Getränkekartons

In agree­ment with the Ger­man Envi­ron­ment Agen­cy (Umwelt­bun­des­amt), the Cen­tral Agen­cy Pack­a­ging Regis­ter (ZSVR) has published the 2026 edi­ti­on of the mini­mum stan­dard for deter­mi­ning pack­a­ging design for recy­cla­bi­li­ty. The under­ly­ing metho­do­lo­gy remains unch­an­ged, but various assess­ment cri­te­ria have been cla­ri­fied and the mate­ri­al-spe­ci­fic appen­di­ces have been revi­sed. For com­pa­nies, the new mini­mum stan­dard pro­vi­des important gui­dance in view of the future requi­re­ments of the PPWR.

Recy­cla­bi­li­ty is sta­ted as a spe­ci­fic per­cen­ta­ge

The mini­mum stan­dard deter­mi­nes what pro­por­ti­on by weight of pack­a­ging is available as valuable mate­ri­al for recy­cling, taking actu­al sort­ing and reco­very prac­ti­ces into account. The result is sta­ted as a per­cen­ta­ge. This means that the assess­ment does not con­sider only whe­ther pack­a­ging could theo­re­ti­cal­ly be reco­ver­ed, but what pro­por­ti­on of the mate­ri­al is actual­ly available for recy­cling in prac­ti­ce.

For the cal­cu­la­ti­on, the available recy­clable con­tent is redu­ced by design-rela­ted los­ses of valuable mate­ri­al. The resul­ting figu­re is then expres­sed in rela­ti­on to the total weight of the respec­ti­ve object of deter­mi­na­ti­on.

If pack­a­ging con­sists of seve­ral com­pon­ents, it must first be deter­mi­ned what con­sti­tu­tes the object of deter­mi­na­ti­on. Sepa­ra­ble com­pon­ents that enter recy­cling sepa­ra­te­ly are each asses­sed indi­vi­du­al­ly. Inte­gra­ted com­pon­ents, by con­trast, are asses­sed tog­e­ther with the main body of the pack­a­ging. The indi­vi­du­al results for sepa­ra­te­ly asses­sed com­pon­ents are not com­bi­ned into a weigh­ted over­all result.

The most important chan­ges in the 2026 mini­mum stan­dard

The fun­da­men­tal assess­ment logic remains unch­an­ged. Howe­ver, the 2026 edi­ti­on cla­ri­fies exis­ting requi­re­ments, adjus­ts ter­mi­no­lo­gy and revi­ses various mate­ri­al-spe­ci­fic pro­vi­si­ons.

New clas­si­fi­ca­ti­on sys­tem for paper and card­board pack­a­ging

The pre­vious­ly used gene­ral term “fib­re-based pack­a­ging” has been dis­con­tin­ued. Ins­tead, the mini­mum stan­dard now distin­gu­is­hes bet­ween three cate­go­ries:

  • Paper and card­board pack­a­ging, exclu­ding com­po­si­te pack­a­ging
  • Liquid pack­a­ging board
  • Com­po­si­te pack­a­ging pre­do­mi­nant­ly made of paper and card­board, exclu­ding liquid pack­a­ging board


Under this clas­si­fi­ca­ti­on sys­tem, the dif­fe­rent pack­a­ging cate­go­ries are pre­sen­ted sepa­ra­te­ly in the mate­ri­al-spe­ci­fic appen­di­ces. The indi­vi­du­al fib­re com­pon­ents are now also shown direct­ly in the rele­vant tables of the mini­mum stan­dard. This is inten­ded to faci­li­ta­te prac­ti­cal appli­ca­ti­on.

Defi­ni­ti­on of com­po­si­te pack­a­ging ali­gned with the PPWR

As part of the revi­si­on, the defi­ni­ti­on of com­po­si­te pack­a­ging was also ali­gned with the PPWR. The mini­mum stan­dard the­r­e­fo­re adopts the cor­re­spon­ding ter­mi­no­lo­gy of the Euro­pean Pack­a­ging and Pack­a­ging Was­te Regu­la­ti­on.

The pre­cise assign­ment of pack­a­ging to a cate­go­ry remains decisi­ve for the sub­se­quent assess­ment. Com­pa­nies should the­r­e­fo­re check whe­ther the new ter­mi­no­lo­gy chan­ges the clas­si­fi­ca­ti­on of their pack­a­ging.

Cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­ons for coa­ted and colou­red glass

The assess­ment of cer­tain glass pack­a­ging has also been cla­ri­fied. For coa­ted or colou­red glass, trans­lucen­cy is no lon­ger asses­sed sole­ly on the basis of a degree of trans­mis­si­on. Ins­tead, a tech­ni­cal­ly defi­ned glass sam­ple is now used as a refe­rence.

This chan­ge pro­vi­des a more spe­ci­fic basis for clas­si­fy­ing the rele­vant glass pack­a­ging within the mini­mum stan­dard.

Pack­a­ging attri­bu­tes added and dif­fe­ren­tia­ted

The mate­ri­al-spe­ci­fic appen­di­ces have been revi­sed in seve­ral places. New pack­a­ging attri­bu­tes have been added, while exis­ting attri­bu­tes have been dif­fe­ren­tia­ted in grea­ter detail or com­bi­ned whe­re dif­fe­rent vari­ants lead to the same assess­ment result.

Com­pa­nies should the­r­e­fo­re not rely sole­ly on an ear­lier assess­ment of their pack­a­ging. They should check whe­ther the rele­vant mate­ri­als, com­pon­ents and design para­me­ters are descri­bed dif­fer­ent­ly or more pre­cis­e­ly in the 2026 edi­ti­on.

Chan­ged clas­si­fi­ca­ti­on of cer­tain coa­tings and adhe­si­ves

The­re are also chan­ges rela­ting to cer­tain poly­mer disper­si­on coa­tings and hot-melt adhe­si­ve appli­ca­ti­ons. The­se are no lon­ger auto­ma­ti­cal­ly clas­si­fied as recy­cling incom­pa­ti­bi­li­ties. Ins­tead, man­da­to­ry test­ing is requi­red.

Important­ly, the chan­ged clas­si­fi­ca­ti­on does not auto­ma­ti­cal­ly result in a more favoura­ble assess­ment. Wit­hout a suc­cessful test, the item can­not be taken into account posi­tively when deter­mi­ning recy­cla­bi­li­ty.

The zero-per­cent rule remains rele­vant

A cen­tral prin­ci­ple of the mini­mum stan­dard remains unch­an­ged: if a design para­me­ter is clas­si­fied as an incom­pa­ti­bi­li­ty, the recy­cla­bi­li­ty of the respec­ti­ve object of deter­mi­na­ti­on is 0 per­cent. This appli­es regard­less of how small the pro­por­ti­on by weight of the incom­pa­ti­ble com­po­nent is.

An exam­p­le pro­vi­ded by the ZSVR illus­tra­tes how signi­fi­cant­ly indi­vi­du­al design ele­ments can affect the result. In a PET trig­ger spray bot­t­le that was exami­ned, a label adhe­si­ve that was not washa­ble results in recy­cla­bi­li­ty of 0 per­cent. After swit­ching to a sui­ta­ble washa­ble adhe­si­ve, the opti­mi­sed exam­p­le achie­ves 94.3 per­cent. The results rela­te exclu­si­ve­ly to the pack­a­ging exam­p­le shown and can­not be appli­ed gene­ral­ly to other pack­a­ging.

The exam­p­le demons­tra­tes that even com­pon­ents with a com­pa­ra­tively low pro­por­ti­on by weight can be decisi­ve for the assess­ment of the enti­re object of deter­mi­na­ti­on.

What does the mini­mum stan­dard mean for the PPWR?

Under the PPWR, recy­cla­bi­li­ty beco­mes a con­di­ti­on for pla­cing pack­a­ging on the mar­ket. Accor­ding to the ZSVR’s expl­ana­ti­ons, from 2030 com­pa­nies may place on the mar­ket only pack­a­ging that is at least 70 per­cent recy­clable.

The mini­mum stan­dard also sta­tes recy­cla­bi­li­ty as a per­cen­ta­ge. Com­pa­nies can the­r­e­fo­re alre­a­dy assess whe­re their pack­a­ging stands in rela­ti­on to the Euro­pean 70-per­cent thres­hold.

Howe­ver, this clas­si­fi­ca­ti­on does not yet con­sti­tu­te final pro­of of future PPWR com­pli­ance. The bin­ding Euro­pean cal­cu­la­ti­on and assess­ment metho­do­lo­gy will be laid down only in the dele­ga­ted act under Artic­le 6 PPWR, which is still pen­ding.

Accor­ding to the ZSVR’s assess­ment, pack­a­ging that per­forms well under the mini­mum stan­dard is likely to be well posi­tio­ned with regard to the expec­ted Euro­pean requi­re­ments. Howe­ver, a final assess­ment will be pos­si­ble only once the Euro­pean requi­re­ments have been ful­ly spe­ci­fied.

What should com­pa­nies review now?

The 2026 mini­mum stan­dard is inten­ded to be used to assess pack­a­ging pla­ced on the mar­ket in 2027. Com­pa­nies should the­r­e­fo­re fami­lia­ri­se them­sel­ves with the updated requi­re­ments at an ear­ly stage.

The fol­lo­wing ques­ti­ons should be a par­ti­cu­lar focus:

  • Has the pack­a­ging used been reas­ses­sed under the 2026 edi­ti­on?
  • Has the pack­a­ging been assi­gned to the cor­rect pack­a­ging cate­go­ry?
  • Which com­pon­ents tog­e­ther form one object of deter­mi­na­ti­on?
  • Does the pack­a­ging con­tain mate­ri­als, coa­tings, labels or adhe­si­ves that lead to los­ses of valuable mate­ri­al?
  • Are the­re design para­me­ters that are clas­si­fied as incom­pa­ti­bi­li­ties?
  • Are addi­tio­nal tests requi­red for cer­tain mate­ri­als or design para­me­ters?
  • Whe­re can recy­cla­bi­li­ty be impro­ved by chan­ging the pack­a­ging design?


An ear­ly assess­ment crea­tes trans­pa­ren­cy and shows which pack­a­ging may requi­re opti­mi­sa­ti­on.

Assess recy­cla­bi­li­ty at an ear­ly stage

The 2026 mini­mum stan­dard pro­vi­des com­pa­nies with an updated basis for deter­mi­ning the recy­cla­bi­li­ty of pack­a­ging sub­ject to sys­tem par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on. At the same time, the assess­ment is beco­ming incre­asing­ly important due to the PPWR and future Euro­pean requi­re­ments.

Noven­tiz sup­ports com­pa­nies in ana­ly­sing their pack­a­ging port­fo­lio, clas­si­fy­ing the regu­la­to­ry requi­re­ments of the PPWR and iden­ti­fy­ing poten­ti­al action at an ear­ly stage.

Eco-Check work­shop: cla­ri­ty in just a few steps

Deter­mi­ne your role as manu­fac­tu­rer or pro­du­cer and iden­ti­fy the spe­ci­fic action you need to take.

rota­te – recy­cla­bi­li­ty assess­ment

Using our reco­g­nis­ed rota­te test method, based on the mini­mum stan­dard of the Cen­tral Agen­cy Pack­a­ging Regis­ter curr­ent­ly in force and in accordance with the PPWR, we assess your pack­a­ging for recy­cla­bi­li­ty.

Share:

Still questions about the new minimum standard?

Contact our project manager recyclability/rotate

Profilbild Peter El-Gazzar Noventiz